A Closer Look at two Philosophical Trees

 Two Dominant Trees (🌳) of Philosophy today.

The Genealogy of Postmodernism

1. Ancient/Medieval Roots (the soil)
- Sophists (Protagoras, Gorgias): “Man is the measure of all things.” Early relativists who doubted objective truth.
- Skeptics (Pyrrho, Sextus Empiricus): Suspended judgment, argued certainty is impossible.
- Nominalists (Ockham): Universals are just names, not real essences. A precursor to anti-essentialism.
These are early shadows of the postmodern impulse: suspicion of universals, emphasis on perspective.

2. Early Modern Break (the trunk)
- Descartes & Rationalism: “Cogito” sought indubitable foundations. Ironically, by making the subject central, he set the stage for questioning those foundations.
- Kant: Split noumenon (things-in-themselves) vs. phenomenon (what we can know). This critical turn sowed the seeds of later relativism: we never grasp reality directly, only through categories.
- Hegel: History and truth are dialectical — destabilizes static absolutes.

3. 19th-Century Crisis (thick branches)
- Marx: Truth is tied to material conditions and ideology (proto-critical theory).
- Nietzsche: “God is dead.” Truth as a mobile army of metaphors; suspicion of morality, language, metaphysics.
- Freud: Consciousness is not sovereign; hidden drives shape thought.
- Saussure: Language is differential, arbitrary signs; no fixed essence.
Together: the “masters of suspicion” + structural linguistics = the core ingredients for postmodernism.

4. Structuralism (the canopy before the split)
- Lévi-Strauss: Myths and cultures as structures of difference.
- Althusser: Ideology as a system of signs.
- Foucault (early): Discourses as epistemes; knowledge/power regimes.
- Structuralism said: meaning is systematic, not individual — but still believed structures could be mapped.

5. Postmodernism Proper (the splintering branches)
- Derrida (Deconstruction): Texts have no final center; meaning endlessly deferred (différance).
- Lyotard: Incredulity toward metanarratives. Grand truths collapse into local language games.
- Baudrillard: Hyperreality, simulacra — signs no longer point to reality but only to other signs.
- Foucault (late): Power/knowledge permeates everything; no outside vantage point.
This is the full flowering: relativism, anti-essentialism, suspicion of truth, rejection of grand narratives.

6. Later Offshoots (twisting vines)
- Post-structuralism: More playful (Deleuze/Guattari’s rhizomes).
- Postcolonialism (Said, Spivak): All narratives are situated, often serving imperial interests.
- Cultural/postmodern theory in the arts: Fragmentation, irony, pastiche.

Core Lineage in One Breath
Sophists → Skeptics → Nominalism → Descartes (subject) → Kant (limits of knowledge) → Hegel (historicity) → Nietzsche (death of God) → Freud (unconscious) → Saussure (language as system) → Structuralism → Derrida, Lyotard, Foucault, Baudrillard → Postmodernism.

---

The Genealogy of Critical Theory

1. Early Roots (the soil)
- Kant: Critique as method — interrogating conditions of knowledge, morality, reason.
- Hegel: History as dialectic; freedom unfolds through contradictions.
- Young Hegelians (Feuerbach, Bauer): Religion and ideology as alienations.
This is the critical impulse: reason turned on itself, freedom through negation.

2. Marx & the Materialist Trunk
- Karl Marx: Society as structured by class struggle. Ideology masks domination. Alienation, exploitation, commodity fetishism.
- Engels: Extended critique into science, history.
- Later Marxists (Kautsky, Luxemburg): Political-economic critique.
- Marxism made “critique” systemic: power is baked into economic and social relations.

3. Neo-Marxist Branches (late 19th–early 20th c.)
- Lukács: Reification — social relations appear as things. Consciousness shaped by class position.
- Gramsci: Hegemony — ruling class maintains power through cultural consent, not just force.
- Lenin/Trotsky: Revolutionary praxis.
These push critique beyond economics into culture, ideology, and everyday life.

4. Frankfurt School (the great canopy)
This is “Critical Theory” in its classic sense (1920s–70s):
- Max Horkheimer & Theodor Adorno: Dialectic of Enlightenment — reason itself can become domination (instrumental reason).
- Herbert Marcuse: One-Dimensional Man — consumer culture pacifies dissent.
- Walter Benjamin: Cultural critique, aura, mechanical reproduction.
- Erich Fromm: Psychoanalysis + Marxism, freedom vs. conformity.
The hallmark here: critique of capitalism, culture, science, and reason itself as instruments of domination.

5. Second Generation (late 20th c.)
- Jürgen Habermas: Tried to rescue Enlightenment through communicative reason. Critical theory shouldn’t collapse into nihilism — sought universal norms in discourse ethics.
- Axel Honneth: Recognition theory — oppression is denial of recognition.
Here critique moves toward constructive grounding: not just suspicion, but possibilities for justice and mutual recognition.

6. Contemporary Extensions (the vines)
- Critical Race Theory (Bell, Crenshaw, Delgado): Law and institutions encode racial power.
- Feminist Critical Theory (Irigaray, Fraser, Butler): Gender as power-constructed, but also a site of resistance.
- Postcolonial Theory (Said, Spivak): Colonial domination persists through discourse and institutions.
- Queer Theory: Critiques of normativity itself.
These extend the suspicion: hidden domination everywhere — law, language, gender, identity, culture.

Core Lineage in One Breath
Kant (critique) → Hegel (dialectic) → Marx (ideology, class) → Lukács/Gramsci (consciousness, hegemony) → Frankfurt School (culture + instrumental reason) → Habermas/Honneth (communication, recognition) → CRT, feminism, postcolonial, queer theory (power across race, gender, empire, identity).

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Transcendence and Morality: A Framework for a New Society

  Transcendence and Morality: A Framework for a New Society Unvermögen --- Table of Contents 0. Definitions I. Philosophical Foundations: Understanding the Struggle and Transcendence II. Practical Application: Transforming Society Through Existing Systems     1. Removing Pre-Camels and False Lions Through Dignified Support Systems     2. Ensuring the Common Good Through Digital IDs, Democratic Participation, and Self-         Regulation of Extremes     3. Ensuring Access to Resources for All to Become Children III. Challenges and Concerns IV. State-Led Frontier Technology V. A Look into the Future - Singularity VI. Final Summary VII. Appendix (case studies and footnotes) --- 0. Definitions Note to the reader: The following terms are defined as they will be used throughout this document, often with specific nuances that differ from common usage.  Careful attention to these definitions is crucial for...
Read more

A Manifesto for the Age of Intelligent Machines (for people with Liberal leanings)

A Manifesto for the Age of Intelligent Machines: Equity, Justice, and Collective Prosperity   As we stand on the precipice of a new technological era, driven by Artificial Intelligence (AI) and automation, we have an opportunity—perhaps the greatest of our generation—to create a future that works for everyone. The decisions we make today will determine whether the benefits of these technologies are equitably distributed, or whether they exacerbate the inequalities that have long plagued our society. It is our responsibility to ensure that AI serves the public good, fosters economic opportunity, and strengthens the social fabric of our nation. AI has the potential to transform every aspect of society—from healthcare and education to energy and the environment—but it must be developed with a commitment to justice, fairness, and inclusion. This manifesto is a call to action for a future where technology works for all, not just the privileged few, and where the principles of equity and...
Read more

"It is What it Is."

Image
The world seems to have gone to shit. All the truths I believe in seem to be under attack. The very foundations we build our society upon.      Rule of Law      Democracy      Popular Sovereignty Nothing is sacred, or safe anymore. The loudest words I seem to hear are: "Everything happens for a reason." "It was meant to be." "Nothing can be done about it." It's not just here in America. "仕方ない" Among the religious, "It's God's will." "It must be a part of God's plan." "We're not meant to understand God's plan." "إن شاء الله" The entire Hindu and Buddhist religion is based on this - Karma and Śūnyatā . This is pure  Fatalism ;        Predeterminism ; where everything is already decided       Lack of free will ; where all humans just follow a prescribed script       Resignation ; giving up in the face of inevitability But those who adhere to these thoughts are not quite the same.  There...
Read more